Talking Points Memo: Judicial Takebacks: Reagan Nominee Overlooked Supreme Court Ruling On Corporate Donations

-By Ryan J. Reilly

May 31, 2011- Last week a federal judge nominated by President Ronald Reagan rocked the campaign finance world when he ruled that corporations could give directly to candidates. Now he's signaled he might want a do over.

James C. Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia indicated in an order issued Tuesday that he's considering whether his ruling ignored Supreme Court rulings in 2003 (FEC v. Beaumont) and 1997 (Agostini v. Felton) which upheld the ban on corporate donations.

Cacheris requested that both federal prosecutors and lawyers representing two businessmen who allegedly reimbursed their employees' donations to Hilary Clinton file briefings on his decision by 5 p.m. Wednesday. He wants the briefings to be less than 10-pages in length and has scheduled a court hearing for Friday morning.

The judge based his 52-page ruling last week on the Supreme Court's more recent decision in the Citizens United case.

"For better or worse, Citizens United held that there is no distinction between an individual and a corporation with respect to political speech," Cacheris had written. "Thus, if an individual can make direct contributions within [campaign finance] limits, a corporation cannot be banned from doing the same thing."

But his decision appears to have ignored a 2003 Supreme Court opinion, written by Justice David Souter, which held that "applying the prohibition to nonprofit advocacy corporations is consistent with the First Amendment."

FULL STORY HERE:


'Talking Points Memo: Judicial Takebacks: Reagan Nominee Overlooked Supreme Court Ruling On Corporate Donations' have no comments

Be the first to comment this post!

Would you like to share your thoughts?

Your email address will not be published.

five × one =

ProtectOurElections.org Copyright 2014 All Rights Reserved.